Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV part one Essay

The contrast among Hotspur and Hal is the main theme in Henry IV embark on around peerless and creates an enthralling play. Hal and Hotspur atomic publication 18 score opposites in most styles scarce when examined to a greater extent than nextly one realises that their moral values be the same. They atomic number 18 both ambitious and placed to succeed more over unless one fag prevail. At the opening of the play Henry IV draws a clear contrast in the middle of Hotspur and his son, whose reputation is sullied by riot and dis detect.The king then goes so far as to wish they had been exchanged when infants, so strongly does he nonice the difference between them. There are mevery examples of the way that the two cannot exist at the same conviction. Hal and Hotspur are both wedge shapees who require to break through. Falstaff is the former(a) main char put to worker in the play. Falstaff has a totally unalike view on purity to that of Hotspur. This is demon in venture II when Falstaff runs international from the two robbers, he values his safety some(prenominal) more than his reputation. Hotspur would never think just about doing anything like that he would prefer to fight. In between these two extreme ideas of remark is HalThroughout the play Shakespeare juxtaposes from one panorama to an another(prenominal)(prenominal). One dig may be in truth solemn and salutary and then the next pellet am employ. For instance manage II sight iii is not one of merri ment and mirth, Hotspur bubbles about the uprising and how unplayful it is keep upting. The next convulsion, function II scene iv, shows Hal in the tap house joking with Falstaff. Shakespeare juxtaposes to show the contrast between Hal and Hotspur. The juxtaposition shows how apiece hero copes with the situations that they find themselves in. It also shows how two people stomach different qualities and they are two different types of leaders. Shakespeare is asking what qualities does a severe leader possessesAs his nickname suggests, Harry Percy is an impulsive and reckless character that acts firstly and thinks later. His courage and rashness are the two qualities constantly commented on by the other characters in the play. Henry sees Percy as a young god of war, impair in swathling clothes and says he is acknowledged by all as the holder of military title capital. He is regarded as the greatest soldier in Europe. On the whole it is his bravery which impresses them most, for them he is the figure of idiom of honour, the living example of those chivalric values to which a noble young should aspire. By the revoke of the play however, we confirm had an opportunity to see Hotspur in perspective and our judgement of him is not so favourable. We realise that, brave and sympathetic as he is, his interestingness of honour is dangerously obsessive, so much so that it leads him to threaten the peace and unity of the kingdom. His cause however is right, Mortimer has more right to the throne than Henry. He is very proud and would hate to carry anything plainly the best.At the conclusion of the play Falstaff humbles honour to an empty concept. For Falstaff brio is valuable and must be preserved at any price. He sees the brave Sir Walter Blunts corpse and exclaims Theres honour for you Yet he confesses a moment later, that he has deliberately allowed his men to be killed in order to line his proclaim pockets. Give me brio which if I can save, so if not, honour comes unlooked for, and theres an windup Falstaffs version of honour licenses him to do anything so long as his testify flavor is preserved. If we are in doubt that Falstaffs honour is as dangerous and empty an idea as Hotspurs, then we are finally convinced by his shocking mutilation of Hotspurs corpse. The irony, of course of instruction, is that Falstaff commits this cowardly act in order to gain the rewards of the honour he despises.Between the two extreme attitudes to honour is the figure of Hal. At the beginning of the play, as his yield points out, his reputation is the very opposite of Hotspurs. As the play goes on Hal begins to exhibit a changed public image. The rebel Veronon describes his preparations for war in terms which demonstrate Hal as the very soul of honour. Being honourable doesnt sterilise you a sincere leader it is the opposite in fact. Hal is a bang-up leader and he is quite dishonourable, Hotspur is the epitome of honour but isnt a good leader. To be a good leader you indispensability to be able to use rhetoric and be very slick and a bit dishonest. Hotspur is none of these and this is why he is not a good leader.Hal is the central character in the play and in his arm to maturity we see a princes education as he learns the character and responsibilities of kingship. Hal has a reputation for beingness part of a low life circle that spend most of their time getting drunk, womanising and thieving. Hal is s ly and underhand this is sh avouch in his monologue at the end of Act 1 scene ii. He says that he is aware of the nature of his tavern companions but pass on put up with their idleness for a while. He impart model the sun by allowing himself to be c everyplaceed with clouds, so that when he reappears it impart be amazing, My reformation glittering oer my fault shall show more goodly and attract more eyes In some ways this is quite youthful and immature. For just as Hotspur is over nauseating to monopolise honour, Hal here depends over anxious to pre radiate his reformation in the most dramatic way. Hal has no pride in himself until his reformation when he becomes the prince he should be.Hotspur shows his dislike for rhetoric and his love of truth in Act III. Glendower talks of disturbances of a heavenly and earthly nature at his induce at my birth the front of heaven was full of fiery shapes, Hotspur contradicts these comments. Glendower continues talking about how he is ma gical. Here Hotspur shows his vehement side by maxim to Glendower, let me not understand you then Speak it in rip off, meaning that no men speaks better Welsh (talks nonsense and brags). Hotspur doesnt like the way Glendower uses rhetoric relentlessly. He prefers to speak the straightforward truth. From this childish exchange we gain further insight into Hotspurs character, he cannot set up to think that someone else could share glory and honour with him. This also shows that he would prefer to speak the truth instead than made up stories.Hal on the other hand loves to talk in rhetoric and uses it all of the time. He is very good at using language to get his own way. This is shown in Act III scene ii. In this scene we see the King and the Prince together for the first time. The King says that Hal must have been sent by God to punish his own mistreadings. The King cant understand why in spite of his royal note Hal is so attached to vulgar pleasures with his unfavourable compani ons such barren pleasures, rude federation. Hal is hurt and in a subdued and repentant mood replies that he is not guilty of everything that he is charged with. He says that the stories are beady-eyed gossip and asks for forgiveness As well as I am doubtless I can purge Myself of many I am charg withal.The King then goes on to talk about how little respect people have for Hal and how he has garbled his place on the council thy place in council thou hast rudely illogical. Hal is obviously hurt by the extent to which he has lost his catchs affection and respect and in a passionate speech swears he will fork over himself and kill Hotspur, I will redeem all this on Percys head. We know that Hal is very cunning so he might actually be pretending that he is hurt by what his set about says so that he can win spine his affections. In this scene we see an aspect of Hal that makes him a good leader. He can use rhetoric and acting to get his own way. This is something that Hotspur nev er does as he prefers to be up front and honest.This is a very important scene for other reasons besides the rhetoric and the rapprochement of the King and the Prince. Here we are made aware of the essential part that the rivalry plays in Henry IV Part 1. In the very first scene of the play we noticed how Henry compares the two, to Hals single out Hotspur is everything he would like his own son to be. Hal and Hotspur are each certain of the others pursuits in Act 1 Scene iii Hotspur calls Hal that same sword-and-buckler Prince of Wales time in Act II scene iv Hal characterizes Hotspur as a murderous hothead. Neither judgement reveals the respect they feel for each other. instanter we see that their rivalry is to be crucial to the salvation, not only of Hals character, but of the kingdom. The personal and policy-making threads of the play are entwined, and we are prepared for the climax, the single combat of Hal and Hotspur in Act V In Act V scene v. When they are about to fight Hal says Hotspur is a very valiant rebel but that they can no durable share in glory. Two stars cannot move in one course and England cannot have a double reign of Hal and Hotspur. It shall not replies Hotspur, for the hour is come, To end the one of us This really shows the great respect that they have for each other. Shakespeare is dictum that to be a good leader you need to be able to use language to your advantage.In Act IV scene I we see one of many scenes that show how impatient and impetuous Hotspur is. Hotspur receives a letter from his father formulation that he will not be bringing troops as he is sick. Hotspur exclaims that Northumberlands unwellness infects the whole enterprise, Tis catching hither, all the same uptide to our camp This has greatly reduced the number of troops available for fighting and really they should postpone the attack until other soldiers arrive. Hotspur says that his fathers absence will make their business seem all the more heroic and daring (thus adding to his own honour), It lends a grandness and more great opinion, A larger dare to our enterprise. So they decide to go ahead with the attack against the wishes of Worcester. For Hotspur war is not regarded as something terrible and destructive but is simply a means of more glory. At the end of Act I Scene ii he shows his immature attitude, O, let the hours be short, Till fields and blows and groans applaud our amuseHal is in no way impatient and impetuous, Hal is scheming and thinks about what he has to do rather than rushing in. He knows what he wants this is shown in his soliloquy in Act I. This is one of the reasons why he is a really good leader. He doesnt get flustered, he holds his cards close to his chest.Hotspur has a bad temper that flares up over of the slightest thing. He is render as a fiery red head who acts first and thinks later, even his name suggests this. In Act I scene iii Hotspur is in the court with the King. Hotspur is refusing to give the King any prisoners unless he pays ransoms for Mortimer who has been captured. The king refuses saying that Mortimer is a traitor redeem a traitor home, Let him hunger on the Welsh mountains This is too much for Hotspur who flies into one of his tempers and exclaims revolted Mortimer.He tries to explain that Mortimer fought bravely for the king Those mouth wounds, which valiantly he took, When on the gentle Severns sedgy bank. Henry doesnt list and departs from the court. Hotspur is beside himself with rage he wants to express his feelings even at the risk of his own safety, and attempts to follow the King An if the devil come roar for them, I will not send them he will not give up the prisoners. He is restrained by his father, but continues to rant. This is the reason that the rebellion begins. Hotspur doesnt think straight when he is in one of his tempers and is lucky that his father was there to restrain him. This is also an example of the way that Hotspur takes action rather than t hinking about it.Hal is cool headed but can be marked-up towards Falstaff. He knows that one day soon he will have to break his ties with Falstaff. Deep down Hal knows that Falstaff is a thief, and a king cannot be friends with him. As the play draws on Hal drifts slowly away from Falstaff. In the midst of the battle Falstaff offers Hal a bottle of wine instead of a weapon, Hal angrily throws it back, underlining the desperate circumstance by his question is it a time to raillery and dally now. Hal has realized when play must stop and serious life begin, but Falstaff has not. A number of times during the play Hal blames Falstaff of debasing him but it is the other way round. Hal is the corrupter. In act V scene iv Falstaff stabs Hotspurs dead body and pretends that he has killed him. He says that Hal is assembly and did not kill Hotspur. Hal isnt angry with him and even offers him help. This shows that Hal has not alone tired of Falstaffs company. He is torn between princely l ead and princely fun.Hotspur is extremely ambitious. He believes that he can do anything he wants to. He believes he can pluck bright honour from the dream- An if the devil come roar for them I will not send them. This shows how Hotspur has the utmost confidence in himself. Sometimes his ambition can over rule reason. His main ambition in life is to get honour. Since he wants to monopolize honour, he must defeat any possible rival, in this case Hal. Hotspur rebels against the king because he feels that his honour is threatened by the Percys association with what he calls this ingrate and cankered Bolingbroke. He doesnt wants to be King. He is just trying to do what he believes is right.Mortimer is the rightful King and even though to rebel is wrong in this case it is right. But what is honour. In act V Falstaff explicitly states his notion of honour. He wittily reduce honour to an empty concept. The difference between Hal and Hotspur is that Hals attitude to honour is neither obses sive nor unreflective. Hal certainly wants to gain honour and defeat Hotspur, but he does not lack a sense of proportion or of the human cost of war. When Hal makes his challenge it is as much to save blood on either side. When Hotspur wishes for single combat with Hal I feel that he does so because it might increase the glory for him if he wins.We first see Hotspurs private life in Act II scene iii. At his castle in Northumberland where he has received a letter he is not happy about. His married woman Kate enters and shows her concern for him. In this scene we see a tender side of Hotspur we have not seen until now and will not see much of again. She is worried about why for the past few weeks he has been so distant and inattentive For what offence have I this fortnight been A banishd woman from my Harrys bed. Hotspur changes the subject, but it is brought straight back up by Kate.He says that this is a world for battles not for love. When Hotspur tells her he does not love her, K ate seems upset by this and is not sure if he is joking or not. But, says Hotspur, when he is on his horse then he will swear he loves her And when I am o horseback, I will swear I love thee infinitely. He reassures her, saying Whither I go, there shall you go too. This view of Hotspur with his wife allows us to see that he is not completely rash and unfeeling. Most noblemen wouldnt let their wifes near the battle field but Hotspur wants her near and she is going to follow the next day. His exchanges with his wife reveal a tender and affectionate aspect of his character, an aspect that he represses in pursuit of honour.Hal has a different social life to Hotspur. He spends most of his time in the tavern with his friends. He drinks and plays practical jokes on other people. He is very quick witted and loves to use rhetoric. There is no sign of him having any lady friends as he was probably too busy drinking. Falstaff is a womaniser but there is no reason to make us believe that Hal is too. He never seems to get anxious or get cross he is too cool headed.Hotspur seems to be over self-confident, he always seems to be sure that he is right and that the rebels will win. He doesnt wear his heart on his sleeve and covers up his feelings so that it doesnt make him look weak, but deep down or subconsciously he is quite nervous about the rebellion. This is shown in Act II scene iii. In his sleep he has murmured of war and weapons. His wife says In thy faint slumbers I by thee have watchd and heard thee murmur tales of iron wars Hotspur might look confident on the surface but deep down is he. Hotspur is a great contention and doesnt like to lose, he wants to reign supreme. Hal doesnt like losing, this is another reason that Henry IV part 1 is such a great play. The rivalry is phenomenal and neither wants to lose but only one can triumph.Hal on the other hand is quietly confident about everything that he is going to do. This is shown in the soliloquy in Act I. As the pla y goes on he becomes more and more self-assured. In Act II Hal becomes extremely confident, in some ways over confident, after he has listened to his father telling him that he is failing him Hal states that he will kill Hotspur. It is a bit presumptuous of him seeing as Hotspur is the greatest soldier in Britain at that time. Hal must have pass time training and learning how to fight when he was younger or he must have been learning in between being in the tavern, he knew that his time would come.Throughout the play Shakespeare asks questions about lead and what characteristics you need to have to be a good leader. Shakespeare exaggerates Hal and Hotspurs faults, this is because he is querying political power. He is hinting that all political power is corrupt. What is power and how do you get it? He shows that the better leader will be the one that can use language to manipulate people.Hotspur has some very good characteristics but he is not a good leader. Hotspur needs to play t he political game, you cant be honest and be a good leader. The play also shows that you will get punished if you rebel. The characteristics that your must have to be a good leader are being dishonourable, using language to great effect, being ambitious but not cheering about it, being dishonest and being very cunning. These are the qualities that Hal posses, even though Hotspur is probably the better person morally he has not got the characteristics to be a good leader.