HEA ACT :: essays research papers

In our society, there ar many obstacles that pose students who are trying to obtain a college education. First, the student has to do salubrious in high school, pass the S.A.T.s, and be able to afford to be for a college education. For those who cant afford to pay for college there is pecuniary Aid. But what if financial aid was taken away from students ground totally on one(a) underage medicine offense? I leave behind address several reasons why I believe the Souder Amendment is unethical and why it should be repealed. The Souder Amendment was developed by Rep. Mark Souder that denies financial aid to students with a drug conviction. This amendment is in total contradiction of the Higher Education mold which was developed in 1968 to provide financial aid to over 7 million students each year. Financial Aid was invented to provide financial aid to students who come from low income families. Seeing how financial aid is solely based on the families financial household inco me, the money that is awarded to the family should not be in jeopardy if being taken away due to the students prior drug offense. By using this offense as a consequence to committing a drug related crime, it introduces many obstacles for middle class people, 2minorities, and it ignores the virtually widely abused drug on college campuses - alcohol. Working class students are the majority of people that interpret college on scholarships and financial aid. While in school, experimentation may introduce itself as something that should be done objet dart attending college. The consequences of allowing yourself to fall victim to drinking or taking drugs previously only had the consequence of a tremendous hang over the nigh morning. If caught by an official abusing drugs or alcohol, detainment would normally occur and several minor measures would be met to ensure the diversion of attempting to experiment again. But now that the Souder Amendment has been drafted, that one offense prev ents a student from obtaining anymore government financed money to attend school. This is unethical to me because after the student realizes their mistakes and suffers the embarrassment of getting caught, they now energise the burden of trying to obtain money to continue to pay for school. chop-chop raising several thousands of dollars to pay for their next semester rarely happens and they are forced to take a semester off of school to save up so they can enroll the following semester.